Examination of bias of dry weather spot-flow rates compared to the mean flow rates of four periods in three mountain streams with different characteristics: verification of the usage of spot-flow rates to estimate mean discharge loads and implications for appropriate sampling strategies
April 26th, 2022
Ami Tanno, Shigeki Harada, Nobuto Takahashi
Received 2021/11/15, Accepted 2022/02/03, Published 2022/04/26
Ami Tanno1), Shigeki Harada2), Nobuto Takahashi3)
1) Higashinihon Concrete Corporation, Japan
2) Department of Agroenvironmental Sciences, Faculty of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Fukushima University, Japan
3) Department of Regional Sciences, School of Project Design, Miyagi University, Japan
Our previous study showed a close relationship between spot-flow rate (Q) and periodical (30, 14 and 8 days) mean Q by correlation regression analysis for 64 spot Q readings in 2011–2016. The results suggested that spot Q could be used instead of periodical mean Q in discharge load (L)–flow rate (Q) equations with exponential coefficients that are close to unity. This finding supports the estimation of periodical mean L, even when low frequency samplings to know the concentrations (C) of Chemical Oxygen Demand, Total Organic Carbon, Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus and D-SiO2 are conducted. Moreover, changes in the correlation factor and the slope of the regression could be used to estimate the most appropriate sampling frequency. Here, the validity of using the spot Q instead of the periodical (30, 14, 8 and 4 days) mean Q is examined using datasets obtained for the Maekawa River (2011–2015) and the Kurosano River (2015–2017) in addition to the pre-reported Okura River (2011–2016). All three rivers are forestry rivers in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Despite the marked variations in differences in their catchment and river characteristics, regression analyses suggested that spot Q is well suited for estimating the periodical mean Q.
Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s) CC-BY 4.0